MAJOR POWER POLITICS: EVOLUTION OF DISCOURSE SURROUNDING HUMANITARIAN ACTION IN CONFLICT ZONES

In the current global political landscape characterized by great power rivalry, humanitarian action finds itself entangled in the web of geopolitics and power dynamics. This paper argues that humanitarian action in conflict zones serves as a poignant reflection of major power politics, balance of power, and a mêlée between imperialism and humanity. While rooted in principles of humanity, impartiality, neutrality, and independence, humanitarian endeavors are increasingly subjected to politicization, challenging their efficacy and integrity. Through case studies spanning regions such as Palestine, Ukraine, Yemen, Africa, Northeast India, and Kashmir, this paper highlights how humanitarian concerns often take a backseat to geopolitical calculations, revealing inherent tensions between humanitarianism and realpolitik. Drawing insights from the evolving humanitarian landscape, this paper proposes recommendations to enhance principled and effective humanitarian responses amidst ongoing global crises. These include empowering local actors, reforming global financial mechanisms, establishing pre-arranged funding pools, introducing conflict-sensitive training, and promoting transparency in humanitarian action.